*update - Noticed they changed the page a bit, so I reworked it and I hope improved it a bit more...*
Requested by a friend, this site is very sparse on classes or ids, hence the crazy selectors. If anyone has a better way, please let me know.
Seems to work perfectly from most gmail access urls (mail.google.com, www.gmail.com, google's own links... but notably not from the link I use as a url-prefix. If it wasn't for linkification, I might not have noticed.), and represents a work in still in progress.
Before
|
After
|
Install options
- Install Stylish for Firefox, Thunderbird, Flock, Mozilla Suite, SeaMonkey, or Songbird. If you have Stylish already, make sure you're using the latest version and have JavaScript enabled.
- You need Firefox to use this style. Get , then Install Stylish, then come back here to install this style.
- - load into the Stylish extension where you can preview and save it.
- - this style has been updated since you installed it in Stylish.
- - Greasemonkey and Opera users can load this style as a user script.
Feedback
Reviews
Kevin82485 said on Mar 06 2008
I like it, makes it simplistic
Lain_13 said on Sep 25 2007
Simple and clear. Good.
Diddle said on Aug 23 2007
@intrktevo: If you want it to center vertically, add this line to the style and fiddle with the amount of pixels until it's in the middle (it depends on your resolution and I'm too lazy to figure out a better solution atm):
body { margin-top: 200px !important; }
AddyG said on Jul 13 2007
amazing
intrktevo said on Jan 17 2007
Great style..Would be nice if it was centered vertically if possible! thanks!!
JuanBR said on Dec 29 2006
Very Good!!
milo said on Dec 12 2006
very good !!!
secretmethod70 said on Oct 03 2006
Works wonderfully! Any chance you could make one for sites such as Google Calander, Google Reader, etc?
netMASA said on Jun 13 2006
Very nice.
RaveN said on May 26 2006
WOW that did reduce alot of space. Good Job
Paulfox said on Feb 27 2006
YESSSSS . . . . . !! Without a doubt the MOST useful of any "site cleaner-upper" to me, only one I couldn't "RIP replace" due to (as you said) sparse class IDs. RIP did it easily, but even with WebDeveloper I couldn't see what to yank out - you did it very cleverly. Super - thank you!